The prospect of internet privacy is impossible in this
day and age. The government of the United States uses data assemblies to spy on
persons of interest in the name of national security. The government receives this
data from various sources, many of them from companies who take personal
information from individuals for their own profit. While the idea of being
spied on by corporations and agencies may be disconcerting, the fact is that it
is popular in modern culture to share one’s life and movements with the world
via Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other websites. Not only are one’s actions
secretly tracked, but it is considered fun to do so oneself. The issue is that
while the government is held accountable for their actions by the people,
corporations are gathering this information purely for profit, which can be detrimental
to the individual.
Google is known for being one of the more nefarious
gatherers of information their clients. Nathan Newman on the Huffington Post
explains how Google sells gathered data illegally and sold the information to
other companies. The information was used by advertisers to target their products
directly as specific consumers, while this may not appear harmful, Newman
explains that these advertisements can target those in lower economic classes
and help impoverish them with scaled prices. Google also played a role in the
housing crisis of 2008 by allowing advertisements of deceptively low mortgages
that, while not the primary cause of the housing boom, was only exacerbating
the problem for profit. When left to their own devices, companies will exploit
the consumer to obtain more money. Labor unions at the turn of the century
helped to create legislation to curb the exploitation of the worker, while
banks in 1929 and almost in 2008 caused the crash of the free market in the
name of profit. Corporations are more dangerous to the general population than
the government.
As Newman states, the NSA uses the data to track down
threats to national security and while this does involve the invasion of the privacy
of innocent people, they are not harmed in any way. Companies targeting
advertising can influence one to make poor financial choices. This is of
course, a choice and it is one’s own responsibility to make proper use of one’s
assets. Thus, not all blame can be placed upon Google, companies or the
government. While most do not go to the extreme that Hasan Elahi goes, the vast
majority of individuals while internet access willingly share their lives with
strangers. This is not a bad thing; it is merely a change in how society views
privacy. Elahi shares his life to make an artistic statement; everyone else
does it for fun and to fulfill their sociological need for interaction with
other people. Companies must be held accountable in some way for their use of
the data they have. But the act of gathering this information should not be
held too critically, the populous cares little for their own privacy.
What, in principle, is so wrong about price discrimination? We see it all the time and no one really seems to raise cries of unfairness or injustice. See: child-priced movie tickets, coupon-clipping, means-tested tuition, etc.
ReplyDeleteI suppose you could argue that the problem is that on the internet in these cases, people aren't necessarily "aware" that price discrimination is happening. But this seems like a questionable argument -- not everyone knows about the sweet deals all of the coupon-clippers are picking up, either.